Posts Tagged ‘Love’

On Teachers, Teaching, and Learning


2008
01.22

The sequel to my article on “Acting as a Path to a Spirituality of Compassion.”

best regards,

ian

 —

On Teachers, Teaching, and Learning

by Michael Ian Lomongo, May 31, 2002

“When the student is ready, the teacher will come.”

In a previous essay that I wrote, I reflected on the spirituality of acting (and of any art for that matter) and the question of a possible incongruity between the excellence of one’s art (craft/skill/talent/competence) and one’s life (the great Art of one’s life). A friend commented that my question comes from the tendency to confuse two different realms, which may fortunately coincide, but need not do so. The level of a person’s artistic maturity is not necessarily an indication of personal (integral) maturity. Simply put, quite a number of Great artists can be real MAJOR-assholes.

(more…)

Within the Matrix of Love


2008
01.21

 

My review of the Matrix Trilogy.

best regards,

ian

P.S. By the way, saw a portion of “Dark City” last Saturday on Studio 23. Years ago, I received a forwarded email which compared several scene shots from “Dark City” with “The Matrix.” Homage or (unconscious) plagiarism?

 

 

Within the Matrix of Love
by Michael Ian Lomongo, December 12, 2003

I know. Many are disappointed with the Matrix Revolutions and the trilogy as a whole. The last two installments didn’t live up to the promise of the original Matrix. And of course, pundits would always say that the whole thing was just a veritable chopsuey: “love story“-cum-”sci-fi”-cum-”martial arts”-cum-”watered-down pop-philosophy.”

Watered-down pop-philosophy? Maybe. But the trilogy can really serve as a stimulating introduction to philosophy for the general public.

Among the major themes we find in the films are questions regarding illusion and reality, freedom and determinism, power and love.

The first installment focuses on the metaphysical and epistemological questions. What is the Matrix? What is the nature of reality? How do we know for sure whether “our reality” is “really real”?

(more…)

The Matrix, Overloaded


2008
01.21

Posting my review of the first two installations of “The Matrix Trilogy.”

best regards,

ian

The Matrix, Overloaded
by Michael Ian Lomongo, May 26, 2003

I

Why isn’t “The Matrix: Reloaded” as captivating as “The Matrix”?

I don’t think it’s because the novelty of the original movie’s winning combination of stunning visual effects and intriguing philosophical premise has faded. (We know now what “the Matrix” is. We no longer are as curious when we first watched “The Matrix.”) Neither is it simply because most sequels really do fail to come up to expectations. (Consider the “X-men 2″ which is, to me, infinitely better than the first “X-men” movie.)

I loved “The Matrix” mainly because I thought it was pop-philosophy (metaphysics) in film. The only other sci-fi/superhero film that approximates this achievement in recent times was “Spiderman,” a sort of pop-ethics with Kantian/Dostoyevskian/Nietzschean overtones. (Intrigued by a friend’s blurb that “Existenz” was the thinking man’s “Matrix,” I went out of my way to see it. I didn’t like it.)

(more…)

A Closer Look at Closer [Or, Concerning Close(r) Encounters of the "Strange(r)" Kind]


2008
01.21

Had dinner last night (and later, beer) with Emman de la Cruz, Angeli Bayani, Vanni Liwanag, Tara Illenberger, and Fiona (didn’t catch her last name). We talked about, naturally, films, Lav Diaz, “Death in the Land of Encantos,” Angeli’s baby boy (whom she named after the character named Marik (Marat) of Alexei Arbusov’s wonderful romantic play, “The Promise,” and translated into Tagalog by the late Rolando Tinio as “Kawawang Marat.”)

Since Emman, Tara, and Fiona were not familiar with the play, I said it was like the counter, the opposite, play of the very post-modern “Closer.” Both work best if you have good actors playing the characters. After watching or reading “The Promise,” you’d feel like “Ah, it’s worth it. Every tear, every heartache. Love prevails.” After watching “Closer,” you’d end up questioning your notions and ways of loving.

Am posting my thoughts on “Closer” here. 2005.

best regards,
ian

A Closer Look at Closer

[Or, Concerning Close(r) Encounters of the "Strange(r)" Kind]

by Michael Ian Lomongo, April 13, 2005

 

“The truth shall set you free.”

- Jesus Bar-Joseph

 

“What if truth were a woman?”

- Friedrich Nietzsche

 

 

Hello, stranger!

 

If you really (and I mean, REALLY) knew the person you loved, would you still love him/her? (And, mind you, I’m not talking about knowing the “truth ” about the person you loved for we can very well ask with Pilate, “What is the truth, anyway?”)

 

The film/play “Closer” (written by Patrick Marber) raises a lot of tough questions about many of our notions about truth, truth-telling, lies, deception, and the relationship between knowing and loving (either the person or the truth).

 

Is loving ultimately based on the unflinching look on the “truth” or “reality” of the person (no matter how harsh it may be)? Or is it inevitably tied up with the blurred and prettifying (Should I saylying”?) vision which makes lovers overlook glaring flaws and imperfections in the beloved and perhaps for our own sake, perhaps makes the very movement of loving possible?

 

What is our relation to “truth” and truth-telling? As individuals? As lovers?

 

What do we really know about the “truth”? (Pilate: “Quid est veritas?”) What do we really know about the people we love (or think we love)? (“Hello, stranger!”) What do we really know about our own peculiar ways of loving? For that matter, what do we really know about loving?

(more…)