something i wrote for a friend in 2003…
—
I tried to search for websites that (I thought) would mention the influence of Nietzsche on Betti (based on my reading of “The Queen and the Rebels”). I didn’t find any (plus, this is my first encounter with Betti), so I’m thinking this might be a case of me over-reading or seeing what I want to see, or simply a case of similar minds (Nietzsche and Betti) working on the same issue.
Anyway, as you might know, it was in “Beyond Good and Evil” that Nietzsche mentioned the difference between the moralities of masters (the strong) and slaves (the weak). (Once, I read someone mentioning that Hegel had a discourse on masters and slaves. So, again, as I haven’t read Hegel yet, I’m thinking Nietzsche might be taking off from Hegel’s starting point.) But it is in “The Genealogy of Morals” that we find an extended discussion of the difference between these two kinds of morality. The morality of the “masters” proceeds from an affirmation of one’s goodness; the notion of “bad” appears as a contrast, and is secondary, to this valuation. The morality of “slaves,” on the other hand, proceeds from a reversal of this process: slaves see the master as “evil,” which therefore makes him (the slave – the antithesis of the master) “good.”
